The promoter ran a scheme to facilitate illegal early release of clients superannuation benefits through the creation of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs)
Whilst each step may have appeared legitimate for tax purposes, overall it did not pass the “smell test”. Rather than only penalise the SMSF trustees, a bigger stick was used to fine the promoter.
Whilst the case does not refer to action against each client, there would be significant cost and likely remedial action for each SMSF and its trustees.
The advice provided is general advice only as, in preparing it we did not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before making an investment decision on the basis of this advice, you should consider how appropriate the advice is to your particular investment needs, and objectives. You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision relating to a financial product.